Worst Blood Glucose Testing Habits and How to Avoid them

Worst Blood Glucose Testing Habits and How to Avoid Them

Introduction

Monitoring blood glucose levels is a cornerstone of effective diabetes management. However, inaccurate readings caused by poor testing habits can lead to misguided treatment decisions and health risks (American Diabetes Association, 2022). Whether due to improper technique, irregular testing, or neglecting hygiene, such habits can hinder effective blood sugar control.

At the Diabetes Reversal Clinic, under the guidance of Dr. Soumya Hullanavar, we emphasize the importance of accurate blood glucose testing as part of a holistic approach to diabetes management. This article explores common testing mistakes and provides practical solutions to ensure reliable results.

Blood Glucose Testing Habits

Worst Blood Glucose Testing Habits

1. Irregular Testing

• Mistake: Testing blood sugar levels inconsistently or skipping tests altogether.
• Impact: Misses important fluctuations in glucose levels, leading to poor glycemic control (Smith, 2020).
• Solution:
  • Establish a consistent testing schedule based on your healthcare provider’s recommendations.
  • Test at key times, such as fasting, before and after meals, and at bedtime, to track patterns.

2. Testing Only When Symptoms Appear

• Mistake: Relying on physical symptoms like fatigue or thirst to prompt testing.
• Impact: Symptoms may indicate severe fluctuations that could have been prevented with regular monitoring (Jones, 2019).
• Solution:
  • Test proactively, even when you feel fine, to prevent sudden spikes or drops in glucose levels.
  • Use a logbook or app to track results for better understanding and control.

3. Poor Hygiene Practices

• Mistake: Not washing hands before testing or using alcohol wipes incorrectly.
• Impact: Contaminants on the skin can alter readings, and residual alcohol may dilute the blood sample (Miller & Thompson, 2020).
• Solution:
  • Always wash hands with warm water and soap before testing.
  • Avoid using alcohol wipes unless necessary, and ensure the finger is dry before pricking.

4. Using Expired Test Strips

• Mistake: Using test strips past their expiration date or storing them improperly.
• Impact: Expired or damaged strips can provide inaccurate results (American Diabetes Association, 2022).
• Solution:
  • Check the expiration date on test strips before use.
  • Store strips in a cool, dry place, away from humidity and direct sunlight.

5. Incorrect Technique

• Mistake: Improper blood sampling, such as squeezing the finger too hard or using too small a drop of blood.
• Impact: Can lead to diluted or insufficient samples, resulting in errors (Smith, 2020).
• Solution:
  • Use a gentle, steady pressure to obtain a sufficient drop of blood.
  • Follow your glucometer’s instructions to ensure the right sample size.

6. Testing from the Same Spot

• Mistake: Continuously pricking the same finger or area.
• Impact: Causes soreness, calluses, and potential infection (Jones, 2019).
• Solution:
  • Rotate testing sites among fingers or other approved areas like the forearm.
  • Allow each site to heal fully before reusing it.

7. Ignoring Calibration and Maintenance

• Mistake: Failing to calibrate the glucometer or clean it regularly.
• Impact: May result in inaccurate readings, affecting treatment decisions (Miller & Thompson, 2020).
• Solution:
  • Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for calibrating your glucometer.
  • Clean the device as recommended and replace batteries when needed.

8. Not Recording Results

• Mistake: Skipping the step of logging blood sugar readings.
• Impact: Makes it difficult to identify patterns and track progress (Smith, 2020).
• Solution:
  • Use a logbook, mobile app, or glucometer with memory storage to keep track of readings.
  • Share logs with your healthcare provider for better management.

9. Relying Solely on Fasting Glucose Levels

• Mistake: Testing only fasting glucose levels and ignoring post-meal or bedtime readings.
• Impact: Misses key fluctuations that occur after meals or during sleep (Jones, 2019).
• Solution:
  • Test at varied times throughout the day to get a complete picture of glucose trends.
  • Include post-meal readings to monitor how food affects your blood sugar.

10. Using Old or Faulty Devices

• Mistake: Continuing to use outdated or malfunctioning glucometers.
• Impact: Older devices may lack accuracy, leading to incorrect readings (Miller & Thompson, 2020).
• Solution:
  • Upgrade to a reliable, modern glucometer that meets quality standards.
  • Periodically compare your device’s results with lab tests for accuracy.

Tips for Accurate Blood Glucose Testing

1. Prepare Your Supplies: Ensure your glucometer, strips, and lancets are clean and ready to use.
2. Warm Your Hands: Cold fingers may make blood sampling harder. Warm them with gentle rubbing or warm water.
3. Use Fresh Lancets: Avoid reusing lancets to prevent pain, infection, and inaccurate readings.
4. Track Food, Activity, and Stress: Note these factors alongside readings to identify patterns.
5. Consult Your Healthcare Provider: Regularly review your testing habits and results to optimize your diabetes management plan (American Diabetes Association, 2022).

Ayurveda’s Role in Blood Sugar Monitoring

In Ayurveda, consistent monitoring aligns with the principle of self-awareness (Svastha Vritta), which emphasizes proactive health management. Blood sugar testing is a tool to understand how daily choices affect doshic balance and overall well-being (Sharma, 2018).

Ayurvedic Practices for Better Monitoring

1. Routine and Consistency: Following a regular schedule aligns with Dinacharya (daily routine) (Sharma, 2018).
2. Mental Clarity: Mindfulness and meditation reduce stress, which can affect blood sugar levels (Gupta & Singh, 2017).
3. Detoxification: Periodic detox helps eliminate Ama (toxins), supporting stable glucose levels (Chauhan, 2021).

From the Doctor’s Desk

Dr. Soumya Hullanavar shares:
“Accurate blood glucose testing is a crucial aspect of diabetes management. At the Diabetes Reversal Clinic, we educate patients on best practices for monitoring, ensuring they have the tools and knowledge to manage their condition effectively. Combining proper testing habits with Ayurvedic care ensures optimal results.” (Hullanavar, 2023)

Why Choose the Diabetes Reversal Clinic?

1. Comprehensive Education: Learn proper testing techniques to improve accuracy.
2. Holistic Approach: Integrate blood sugar monitoring with personalized Ayurvedic care.
3. Expert Guidance: Led by Dr. Soumya Hullanavar, a specialist in Ayurvedic endocrinology.
4. Sustainable Management: Combine modern tools with Ayurvedic wisdom for long-term control.

Conclusion

Poor blood glucose testing habits can lead to inaccurate readings and hinder diabetes management. By adopting consistent and proper testing techniques, you can ensure reliable results and better control of your health. At the Diabetes Reversal Clinic, we empower patients with the knowledge and tools they need to achieve sustainable diabetes management.

📞 Contact us today: +91 8884722267
🌐 Visit: Diabetes Reversal Clinic

Rediscover balance, vitality, and health with Ayurveda!

Related-

Know more about Ayurveda Diabetes Reversal Treatments.

References

1.American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S15–S33. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2.American Diabetes Association 4. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S40–S52. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3.Polonsky KS. The past 200 years in diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1332–1340. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1110560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4.Barnett D. Elliott P. Joslin MD: A Centennial Portrait. Boston MA: Joslin Diabetes Clinic; 1999. [Google Scholar]

5.Gonder-Frederick LA, Grabman JH, Kovatchev B et al (2016) Is Psychological Stress a Factor for Incorporation Into Future Closed-Loop Systems? J Diabetes Sci Technol 10(3):640–646. 10.1177/1932296816635199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

6.Hermanns N, Scheff C, Kulzer B et al (2007) Association of glucose levels and glucose variability with mood in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 50(5):930–933. 10.1007/s00125-007-0643-y [DOI] [PubMed]

7.Snoek FJ, Bremmer MA, Hermanns N (2015) Constructs of depression and distress in diabetes: time for an appraisal. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 3(6):450–460 [DOI] [PubMed]

8.Petrak F, Herpertz S, Albus C, Hirsch A, Kulzer B, Kruse J (2004) Evidence-based guidelines of the German Diabetes Association – Psychosocial factors and diabetes mellitus. J of Psychosom Res 56(Suppl):672

9.Young-Hyman D, de Groot M, Hill-Briggs F, Gonzalez JS, Hood K, Peyrot M. Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(12):2126–2140. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10.Chung WK, Erion K, Florez JC et al (2020) Precision medicine in diabetes: a Consensus Report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 63(9):1671–1693. 10.1007/s00125-020-05181-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

11.The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329(14):977–986 [DOI] [PubMed]

12.Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM et al (2019) Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care 42(8):1593–1603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

13.Roos T, Hochstadt S, Keuthage W et al (2020) Level of Digitalization in Germany: Results of the Diabetes Digitalization and Technology (D.U.T) Report 2020. J Diabetes Sci Technol 16(1):144–151. 10.1177/1932296820965553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

14.Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(2):66–72. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15.van den Boom L, Karges B, Auzanneau M, et al. Temporal trends and contemporary use of insulin pump therapy and glucose monitoring among children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes between 1995 and 2017. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(11):2050–2056. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16.Beck RW, Riddlesworth TD, Ruedy KJ, et al. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317(4):371–378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17.Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB, et al. Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The GOLD Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317(4):379–387. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18.Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Ehrmann D, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2018;391(10128):1367–1377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19.Kovatchev BP, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Clarke W. Symmetrization of the blood glucose measurement scale and its applications. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(11):1655–1658. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.11.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20.Kovatchev B, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Young-Hyman D, Schlundt D, Clarke WL. Assessment of risk of severe hypoglycemia among adults with IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1870–1875. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21.Mazze RS, Lucido D, Langer O, Hartmann K, Rodbard D. Ambulatory glucose profile: representation of verified self-monitored blood glucose data. Diabetes Care. 1987;10(1):111–117. doi: 10.2337/diacare.10.1.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22.Surwit RS, Feinglos MN, Scovern AW (1983) Diabetes and behavior. A paradigm for health psychology. Am Psychol 38:255–262 [DOI] [PubMed]

23.American Diabetes Association 5. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S53–S72. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24.Skinner TC, Joensen L, Parkin T. Twenty-five years of diabetes distress research. Diabet Med. 2020;37(3):393–400. doi: 10.1111/dme.14157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25.Perrin NE, Davies MJ, Robertson N, Snoek FJ, Khunti K. The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2017;34(11):1508–1520. doi: 10.1111/dme.13448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26.Roy T, Lloyd CE (2012) Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 142(Suppl. 1):S8–S21 [DOI] [PubMed]

27.Khaledi M, Haghighatdoost F, Feizi A, Aminorroaya A (2019) The prevalence of comorbid depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on huge number of observational studies. Acta Diabetologica 56(6):631–650. 10.1007/s00592-019-01295-9 [DOI] [PubMed]